Linux-Advocacy Digest #643, Volume #33 Mon, 16 Apr 01 15:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Chad Everett)
Re: Microsoft gets hard ("JS PL")
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Chad Everett)
Re: Blame it all on Microsoft (Peter da Silva)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (jim dutton)
Re: Col. Hack (Tim Hanson)
Re: Linux needs a standard, user proof distro ("Kelsey Bjarnason")
Re: t. max devlin: kook ("Kelsey Bjarnason")
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Communism ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: More Mafia$oft incompetance on display.. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Everett)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 16 Apr 2001 12:55:30 -0500
On 16 Apr 2001 17:48:20 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 16 Apr 2001 17:15:17 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>On 16 Apr 2001 12:20:25 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>billh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Roberto Alsina"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How does eating fish on fridays connect to loving my neighbour?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>First, why don't you tell us all where in the Bible it states red meat can
>>>>>>not be eaten on Fridays. Then I suggest you read Acts 10:9-16.
>>>>>
>>>>>Who said I am a literallist?
>>>>>Ok, how does drinking wine on sundays express my love for Christ?
>>>>
>>>>It doesn't.
>>>
>>>Then why does Jesus ask his fellows to drink the wine that is his blood?
>>>Just as an excuse to party?
>>>
>>
>>He didn't
>
>Didn't he?
>
>Matthew 26:
>
>26: While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it,
> and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body."
>27 Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying,
> "Drink from it, all of you.28 This is my blood of the covenant, which
> is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
>
Thank you for proving my point and for providing that wonderful Bible passage.
That's not quite what you said, now is it?
I don't see anywhere in that passage where Jesus says that drinking wine on
Sundays expresses love for him.
>
>>>I thought they were showing love for him when doing that. Maybe they just
>>>liked the booze?
>>>
>>
>>you thought wrong.
>
>What were they showing then?
>
The were showing that they were hungry and having their passover dinner.
------------------------------
From: "JS PL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.arch,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Microsoft gets hard
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 14:11:47 -0400
"Chad Everett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:06:23 GMT, Chad Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> >"JS PL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >>
> >> "unicat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>
> >> > Of course there's a name for companies that trusted Microsoft as a
> >> busniess
> >> > partner...extinct!
> >>
> >> Which one is extinct? There's about 32,000 Certified Business Partners
> >> Organizations. And about 6 million developers using Microsoft
Development
> >> tools.
> >> http://www.microsoft.com/business/partners/
> >> Which one became extinct? Ass.
> >>
> >> You really shouldn't Drink & Write.
>
> Of course those numbers supplied by Microsoft on the page you referenced
> is a lie. Try going to the link on that page that let's you find a
> Microsoft "partner" and see what happens.
OK, I come to a few pages which lets me narrow the big list:
United States | English | California |
I then narrow my search to Web Developers (from a choice of about 16
services) | Within 100 miles of Los Angeles
And end up looking at a list of 285 companies.
That looks pretty proportional to their claim of 32,000 worldwide!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Everett)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 16 Apr 2001 13:05:57 -0500
On 16 Apr 2001 17:52:12 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 16 Apr 2001 17:13:50 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>On 16 Apr 2001 12:14:01 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>On 14 Apr 2001 17:46:36 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In 3000BC, the standard included massive rape of the women of the defeated
>>>>>>>and mass sacrifices of the defeated soldiers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Well that's not true at all. Show us an example in 3000BC where
>>>>>>massive rape of the defeated women occurred. Since you throw
>>>>>>out such blatantly false statements as fact, everything you
>>>>>>say is questionable.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ok, before I bother doing it: are you really saying that conquering
>>>>>armies at and around 3000BC ddidn't do that?
>>>>
>>>>I assume this means you have no examples from 3000BC and that you statement
>>>>had no foundation in the facts, which as I said, casts doubt on everything
>>>>that you say.
>>>
>>>Well, you can assume all you want. I am just asking, and it's good that I
>>>did, since apparently you didn't mean that!
>>>
>>
>>I answered your question. Time for you to answer the question.
>
>Just a few more: what kind of evidence would convince you?
>
>>>>I am saying that the Israelites did not. I am also stating that you have
>>>>no evidence of any other group in 3000BC doing this either.
>>>
>>>Ok, would you apologize if I showed evidence that I do?
>>
>>Is there someting to apologize for?
>
>Of course. You said I "threw blatantly false statements". You are calling
>me a liar. If I show evidence to your satisfaction, the least I expect is
>an apology. Otherwise, why should I bother? Just to make happy someone who
>insults me?
>
You shouldn't bother cause you can't do it.
>> I would certainly admit I was wrong if
>>you could come up with an example from 3000BC that showed a "standard" that
>>"included massive rape of the women of the defeated".
>
>I expect something from the same period would be enough? Not exactly dated
>3000BC, of course. Say, between 4000BC and 2000BC?
>
A 2000 year time span?! I don't think so. You're the one who said 3000BC,
not me. Since you're trying to waffle on the date, it's obvious you can't
back up your statement. I'll let you have 3500BC to 2900BC.
>>>> So sure, I am making the claim that in 3000BC, there was no "standard"
>>>> that included "massive rape of women of the defeated".
>>>
>>>Well, it was the de facto standard. Lots of people did it.
>>
>>Again, you make the claim that you cannot back up with any facts or evidence.
>>This puts the validity of everything you say in doubt.
>
>Well, everything everyone says is doubtful. However, I think I can
>show support for my statement.
>
Go for it.
>>> [ -- continued flawed logic and obfuscation deleted -- ]
>
>Perhaps you are willfully blind? How about other brutalities such
>enslavement of the defeated? Would they have the same effect on you
>as rape of the defeated's women?
>
Let's stick to your original assertion. You said it, not me. You said:
"In 3000BC, the standard included massive rape of the women of the defeated
and mass sacrifices of the defeated soldiers." This said during a debate
on of God's law and how it related to war and murder.
It's really very simple. I asked you to back up this claim. Four posts later
and you still haven't. YOu've only tried to change the subject and side-step
the fact that you put out.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter da Silva)
Crossposted-To: comp.theory,comp.arch,comp.object
Subject: Re: Blame it all on Microsoft
Date: 16 Apr 2001 17:56:34 GMT
In article <1ilC6.14932$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Goldhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think this is true. BSD has been around for
> a long time. Despite the excellence of the kernel
> (and the whole OS), it hasn't stormed the OS scene
> like Linux has.
BSD as a free operating system only showed up slightly before Linux, thanks
to the work of the Computer Science Research Group at the University of
California. Then it got bogged down in a lawsuit with AT&T's Unix Systems
Group (later Unix Systems Labs) that was only settled when it was discovered
that USG/USL had uses BSD code extensively without giving credit.
This delay corresponded with the first release of Linux, letting Linux get
a foothold in people's minds that BSD never could surpass. It's all about
mindshare, after all.
Without Linus, BSD would have come out as a viable OS a year later, but
with a much more solid kernel underneath. I don't think the eventual outcome
would have changed much.
I don't think the GPL has anything to do with it. The BSD license is entirely
compatible with the GPL, even with the much-derided "advertising clause". After
all, Linux has the same restriction... through trademark rather than copyright
law, but the end result is the same.
--
`-_-' In hoc signo hack, Peter da Silva.
'U` "A well-rounded geek should be able to geek about anything."
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: WWFD?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jim dutton)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 18:20:48 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Later he says the cup contained "fruit of the vine", which was wine was
>it not? Perhaps you think jesus was drinking unfermented grapejuice?
>You know, that's very unlikely before refrigerators were invented.
That was jesus secret sauce.
Look at me when you do that.
-Jeem, Now get out
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:19:16 -0700
From: Tim Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Col. Hack
"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> Ray Chason wrote:
> >
> > MjM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >Yes, Windows is easy. It's called *submission*.
> >
> > Windows 95: Where do you want to go today?
> > Windows XP: All your base are belong to us.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Where, precisely, did that mangled sentance originally come from?
>
> does anybody know?
>
http://hubert.retrogames.com/history.htm
--
The trouble with being punctual is that people think you have nothing
more important to do.
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
With Seven Servers In California And Texas - The Worlds Uncensored News Source
------------------------------
From: "Kelsey Bjarnason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux needs a standard, user proof distro
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:25:09 GMT
[snips]
"J Sloan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > You forgot to tell me what non-x86 or non-x86 clones WIndows works on.
> >
> > Alpha, for one. And MIPS.
>
> Both dead.
Yet Windows (as the question asked for) - NT 3.51, I think - can quite
happily run on either.
------------------------------
From: "Kelsey Bjarnason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,soc.singles
Subject: Re: t. max devlin: kook
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:25:09 GMT
[snips
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > When *is* M$ going to develop a journaling file system?
> >
>
> Bill Gates is still scratching his head trying to figure out why
> any filesystem would want to keep a diary.
FWIW, according to Microsoft, NT Server 4's NTFS was journaling. So that
would mean they developed it a considerable time ago.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 18:33:35 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 16 Apr 2001 17:48:20 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>On 16 Apr 2001 17:15:17 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>On 16 Apr 2001 12:20:25 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>billh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Roberto Alsina"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How does eating fish on fridays connect to loving my neighbour?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>First, why don't you tell us all where in the Bible it states red meat can
>>>>>>>not be eaten on Fridays. Then I suggest you read Acts 10:9-16.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Who said I am a literallist?
>>>>>>Ok, how does drinking wine on sundays express my love for Christ?
>>>>>
>>>>>It doesn't.
>>>>
>>>>Then why does Jesus ask his fellows to drink the wine that is his blood?
>>>>Just as an excuse to party?
>>>>
>>>
>>>He didn't
>>
>>Didn't he?
>>
>>Matthew 26:
>>
>>26: While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it,
>> and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body."
>>27 Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying,
>> "Drink from it, all of you.28 This is my blood of the covenant, which
>> is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
>>
>
>
>Thank you for proving my point and for providing that wonderful Bible passage.
>That's not quite what you said, now is it?
Actually, it pretty much is. I said "he ased his fellows to drink the wine
that is his blood".
Here he says to his disciples (his fellows) "drink from [this wine] all of
you. This is my blood"
I'd say it was close enough for government work. Yet you said Jesus didn't
say that.
>I don't see anywhere in that passage where Jesus says that drinking wine on
>Sundays expresses love for him.
What day was it[1]? What was the purpose of drinking it?
[1] Keep in mind when the hebrew tradition says the day ends and begins.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 18:37:57 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 16 Apr 2001 17:52:12 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>On 16 Apr 2001 17:13:50 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>On 16 Apr 2001 12:14:01 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>On 14 Apr 2001 17:46:36 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In 3000BC, the standard included massive rape of the women of the defeated
>>>>>>>>and mass sacrifices of the defeated soldiers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well that's not true at all. Show us an example in 3000BC where
>>>>>>>massive rape of the defeated women occurred. Since you throw
>>>>>>>out such blatantly false statements as fact, everything you
>>>>>>>say is questionable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Ok, before I bother doing it: are you really saying that conquering
>>>>>>armies at and around 3000BC ddidn't do that?
>>>>>
>>>>>I assume this means you have no examples from 3000BC and that you statement
>>>>>had no foundation in the facts, which as I said, casts doubt on everything
>>>>>that you say.
>>>>
>>>>Well, you can assume all you want. I am just asking, and it's good that I
>>>>did, since apparently you didn't mean that!
>>>>
>>>
>>>I answered your question. Time for you to answer the question.
>>
>>Just a few more: what kind of evidence would convince you?
Please answer this Chad. I don't want to put up evidence you deem unworthy.
and having to do all the work again.
>>>>>I am saying that the Israelites did not. I am also stating that you have
>>>>>no evidence of any other group in 3000BC doing this either.
>>>>
>>>>Ok, would you apologize if I showed evidence that I do?
>>>
>>>Is there someting to apologize for?
>>
>>Of course. You said I "threw blatantly false statements". You are calling
>>me a liar. If I show evidence to your satisfaction, the least I expect is
>>an apology. Otherwise, why should I bother? Just to make happy someone who
>>insults me?
>
>You shouldn't bother cause you can't do it.
Backup that statement, if you can.
>>> I would certainly admit I was wrong if
>>>you could come up with an example from 3000BC that showed a "standard" that
>>>"included massive rape of the women of the defeated".
>>
>>I expect something from the same period would be enough? Not exactly dated
>>3000BC, of course. Say, between 4000BC and 2000BC?
>>
>
>A 2000 year time span?!
Sure.
> I don't think so. You're the one who said 3000BC,
>not me. Since you're trying to waffle on the date, it's obvious you can't
>back up your statement. I'll let you have 3500BC to 2900BC.
Why not something more recent? Do you believe the habits of warfare
changed for the worse between, say, 2900BC and 2000BC?
>>>>> So sure, I am making the claim that in 3000BC, there was no "standard"
>>>>> that included "massive rape of women of the defeated".
>>>>
>>>>Well, it was the de facto standard. Lots of people did it.
>>>
>>>Again, you make the claim that you cannot back up with any facts or evidence.
>>>This puts the validity of everything you say in doubt.
>>
>>Well, everything everyone says is doubtful. However, I think I can
>>show support for my statement.
>
>Go for it.
I am just making sure I only need to do it once.
>>>> [ -- continued flawed logic and obfuscation deleted -- ]
>>
>>Perhaps you are willfully blind? How about other brutalities such
>>enslavement of the defeated? Would they have the same effect on you
>>as rape of the defeated's women?
>>
>
>Let's stick to your original assertion. You said it, not me. You said:
>"In 3000BC, the standard included massive rape of the women of the defeated
>and mass sacrifices of the defeated soldiers." This said during a debate
>on of God's law and how it related to war and murder.
The specific brutality is not important for the larger argument. Any brutality
deemed unacceptable today would do. You are not seing the forest because of
the trees.
>It's really very simple. I asked you to back up this claim. Four posts later
>and you still haven't. YOu've only tried to change the subject and side-step
>the fact that you put out.
Well, I'm a free man.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 14:41:39 -0400
billh wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>
> > ANSWER THE QUESTION!
>
> Dance, little man, dance. LOL!!!
Notice how Bill Hudson refuses to tell us how long he's served in any combat zones.
Must be because the number of months = ZERO.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.singles
Subject: Re: More Mafia$oft incompetance on display..
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 14:46:57 -0400
Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > MjM wrote:
> >>
> >> tony roth wrote:
> >> >
> >> > hate to be a killjoy but another one bites the dust!
> >> > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/migration/hotmail/default.asp
> >>
> >> So Hotmail finally runs (totally?) on Windows products.
> >
> > Nope...only home page and the graphical front-end.
> >
> > Whoop......de.......fucking......doooooooo.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Microsoft took the damn thing over in 1997! It took them FOUR years, 2
> >> Operating Systems and God knows how many supporting apps to convert it!
> >
> >
> > And after 3 attempts, all they've managed to convert is the home page.
>
> "The home page"? Just how many servers have they converted?
Who the fuck cares.
If it takes LoseDOS 5 servers to just convert the home page, that's an
INDICTMENT of the their product
> If I'm
> reading what they're saying correctly, we're talking 5,000 servers to be
> converted over. 4 years? That's about 3 servers per day, ignoring any
> actual time spent planning, testing, etc.
The ONLY thing that Mafiasoft was able to convert were a couple of
front-end web pages. The REAL work is ***STILL*** being done on Unix.
>
> Okay, smart boy, how long would it take _you_ to roll out a conversion of
> 5,000 servers from, say, IIS+Win2K to Apache + Linux, while maintaining
> service for 100 million users? Let's see your deployment strategy.
1. Set up 25 Unix machines, all ready to roll out except for the users' data.
2. RCP the data from the 5,000 LoseDOS machines to the Windows machines.
3. change the entries in the DNS server.
4. install Linux on the 5,000 LoseDOS servers, and donate them to schools.
2-month operation, at most!
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
