On 11 Aug 2008 at 11:10, Yantisa Akhadi wrote: > Assalamu'alaikum all, > > Sekedar info saja, di salah satu thread Kaskus sedang ramai membicarakan > pertentangan antara beberapa orang Kaskus dengan PC Media, dimana > PCMAV(PC Media AntiVirus) dianggap telah melakukan pelanggaran lisensi > karena menggunakan libclamav yg berlisensi GPL (bukan LGPL lho). > > Linknya bisa diakses di sini : > http://www.kaskus.us/showthread.php?t=937085 > > Ati-ati rada panjang, sampe 26 halaman, melibatkan ancaman ke meja > hijau, e-mail ke FSF (Free Software Foundation), dan pencarian kontak ke > CLAMAV. Sempet mikir juga apakah kita perlu membuat semacam pernyataan > sikap? Tapi rada gak enak juga ntar ada konflik kepentingan ;) > > Peace! > -Iyan-
wa'alaikumussalam, fyi :) yg di kaskus belum baca, yg sudah baca :) 1. http://maseko.com/2008/07/19/pc-media-antivirus-pcmav-15/#comment-57217 (komen # 114) 2. http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20080717.075437.e573caec.en.html == kopas (link #2) sbb : Author: Nigel Horne Date: 2008-07-17 07:54 UTC To: clamav-win32Subject: Re: [clamav-win32] Question regarding using libclamav Pandu Poluan wrote: > My question is: If I create a program that can *optionally* use libclamav, > must that program be GPL-licensed as well? The short answer is "no", there is no obligation for the new program to be licensed under the GPL. The creation of a program that optionally makes function calls to a program licensed under the GPL should not create an obligation to distribute the new program under the GPL. -Nigel Nigel Horne, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Director of Product Management (ClamAV), Sourcefire, http://www.sourcefire.com +44 1226 241048 or +1 706 705 4022 FAX: +44 870 705 9334, Skype: nigelhorne == sinung -- Berhenti langganan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arsip dan info: http://linux.or.id/milis
