Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:01:26AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Can you please apply the following patch then? > > > > > > Remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement > > > > OK. > > > > Thus far I have this: > > Would it be possible to drop support for gcc 3.0 too?
Spose so - I don't know what people are using out there. > AFAIK it has never been widely used. If we assume 3.1+ minimum it has the > advantage that named assembly arguments work, which make > the inline assembly often a lot easier to read and maintain. There are a few places in the tree which refuse to compile with 3.1 and 3.2.
