> Spose so - I don't know what people are using out there. I don't think it was shipped in major distros at least (AFAIK) They all went from 2.95 to 3.1/3.2
Perhaps stick an error for 3.0 in and wait if people are complaining? > > > AFAIK it has never been widely used. If we assume 3.1+ minimum it has the > > advantage that named assembly arguments work, which make > > the inline assembly often a lot easier to read and maintain. > > There are a few places in the tree which refuse to compile with 3.1 and 3.2. Really? Which ones? Haven't seen that and I still use 3.2 occasionally (it's the default compiler on SLES9 and I believe on RHEL3 too) -Andi
