On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 01:22:07PM +0200, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > SMP? > as root? Sorry, yes and yes. 866 MHz The script I used is attached. > That apart, my current conclusion is that multiprocess approach is > definitely interesting and we need to design an architecture that works > fine with both approaches. Period. I agree. I don't think that the multiprocess approach is very safe right now, but in a couple of years I suspect it will be OK. What I'm not sure however is how you go about doing that. - Steve
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC J�rn Nettingsmeier
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Scott McNab
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Karl MacMillan
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Jay Ts
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Jay Ts
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Jay Ts
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC S�bastien M�trot
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
