On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:22:41PM +0200, J�rn Nettingsmeier wrote: > as to cache size, i think 2 meg is out of the question for consumer > hardware. the xeons are painfully expensive compared to 256k > coppermines, and why should that ever change ? (btw, do the xeons > run the 2megs at full clock speed ?) I think so yes. My old PIII (slot 1) had 512k cache though, and that was just a consumer one. > does windows xp even support 2-way smp ? not that i care, but this > fact is crucial to the market prices of such hardware. I expect so, its NT code, which has been smp capable for a while. I was thinking fairly long term BTW, 5-10 years. Which I suppose is pretty irrelevant for the current discussion. - Steve
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC J�rn Nettingsmeier
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Scott McNab
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Karl MacMillan
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Jay Ts
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Jay Ts
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Jay Ts
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC S�bastien M�trot
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
