On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 03:46:05PM +0200, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > - performance (for SMP machine) > - greater robustness > - integration of audio applications not written as pure component Also it means you can write apps in things other than C(++), as long as they can access shm or whatever. - Steve
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC J�rn Nettingsmeier
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Scott McNab
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Karl MacMillan
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Jay Ts
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Jay Ts
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Jay Ts
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC S�bastien M�trot
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- [linux-audio-dev] Performance and Elegance? (Was: High ... Jay Ts
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Performance and Elegance? (Was: H... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Performance and Elegance? (Was: H... Jay Ts
