Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2007 schrieb Rui Nuno Capela: > this d-bus interface seems a good idea nevertheless,
DBUS seems to be very cool, yes. > and now that kde4 is almost on the brink, it sounds logical to push it as > duct tape for phonon and jack, eh? No, never. See the endless discussions on kde-multimedia and lau. KDE needs a multimedia-server/-framework [*]. jack is _not_ what kde needs because jack does neither video nor decoding of compressed formats. And I really don't understand how you want to duct phonon and jack by dbus: Do you want to sent audio data via dbus? Is dbus even capable of these data-rates? Arnold [*] And because relying on just one framework/server has proven to be a bad thing, phonon is "just" an abstraction-layer between the apps wanting a stable api and frontends supporting all the nifty things. -- visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/ --- Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root and do a rm / -rf. Or ask your administrator to do so...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
