Arnold Krille wrote: > Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2007 schrieb Rui Nuno Capela: >> this d-bus interface seems a good idea nevertheless, > > DBUS seems to be very cool, yes. > >> and now that kde4 is almost on the brink, it sounds logical to push it as >> duct tape for phonon and jack, eh? > > No, never. See the endless discussions on kde-multimedia and lau. > KDE needs a multimedia-server/-framework [*]. jack is _not_ what kde needs > because jack does neither video nor decoding of compressed formats. > > And I really don't understand how you want to duct phonon and jack by dbus: > Do > you want to sent audio data via dbus? Is dbus even capable of these > data-rates? >
to my knowledge, phonon is in need of a jack backend, as gstreamer, as pulseaudio, or maybe through xine. what i thought is is not about to let jack be the kde4 audio server, no. i was just thinking about configuration control, not the audio streaming per se. > > [*] And because relying on just one framework/server has proven to be a bad > thing, phonon is "just" an abstraction-layer between the apps wanting a > stable api and frontends supporting all the nifty things. > yes, right. cheers. -- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
