hi Rui, Rui Nuno Capela schrieb: > Arnold Krille wrote: >> Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2007 schrieb Rui Nuno Capela: >>> this d-bus interface seems a good idea nevertheless, >> DBUS seems to be very cool, yes. >> >>> and now that kde4 is almost on the brink, it sounds logical to push it as >>> duct tape for phonon and jack, eh? >> No, never. See the endless discussions on kde-multimedia and lau. >> KDE needs a multimedia-server/-framework [*]. jack is _not_ what kde needs >> because jack does neither video nor decoding of compressed formats. >> >> And I really don't understand how you want to duct phonon and jack by dbus: >> Do >> you want to sent audio data via dbus? Is dbus even capable of these >> data-rates? >> > > to my knowledge, phonon is in need of a jack backend, as gstreamer, as > pulseaudio, or maybe through xine. what i thought is is not about to let > jack be the kde4 audio server, no. i was just thinking about > configuration control, not the audio streaming per se.
GStreamer has a jacksink, unfortunately the jacksrc ist still missing ... > > >> [*] And because relying on just one framework/server has proven to be a bad >> thing, phonon is "just" an abstraction-layer between the apps wanting a >> stable api and frontends supporting all the nifty things. >> > > yes, right. > > cheers. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
