On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 16:15 +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:15:35PM +0100, Esben Stien wrote: > > > But that's really the funny thing here. Your software isn't from the > > free/open source software communities. It doesn't conform to neither > > the free software definition nor the open source definition. > > > > I'm glad that GPLv3 fixes this issue, cause if you state that the > > software is under GPLv3 you may not impose any further restrictions on > > the work, if I read the license correctly. > > > Dio mio. Why does this remind me of Revolutionary Guards > rhetoric from the Cultural Revolution era (People's > Republic of China, mid 1960s) ?
Because you're trolling? :) -DR- _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
