On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:15:35PM +0100, Esben Stien wrote: > But that's really the funny thing here. Your software isn't from the > free/open source software communities. It doesn't conform to neither > the free software definition nor the open source definition. > > I'm glad that GPLv3 fixes this issue, cause if you state that the > software is under GPLv3 you may not impose any further restrictions on > the work, if I read the license correctly.
Dio mio. Why does this remind me of Revolutionary Guards rhetoric from the Cultural Revolution era (People's Republic of China, mid 1960s) ? I suggest you force Christian to declare his sins in public, and after that he should be sent to at least 10 years of hard labour on a collective FOSS farm. Ciao, -- FA Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica Parma, Italia Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
