On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:53:29PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 16:15 +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:15:35PM +0100, Esben Stien wrote: > > > > > But that's really the funny thing here. Your software isn't from the > > > free/open source software communities. It doesn't conform to neither > > > the free software definition nor the open source definition. > > > > > > I'm glad that GPLv3 fixes this issue, cause if you state that the > > > software is under GPLv3 you may not impose any further restrictions on > > > the work, if I read the license correctly. > > > > > > Dio mio. Why does this remind me of Revolutionary Guards > > rhetoric from the Cultural Revolution era (People's > > Republic of China, mid 1960s) ? > > Because you're trolling? :)
No, it reminds me because of the wording. I guess I've grown to be allergic to any statements of the form "You are not a true Communist/Christian/Moslim/American/..." as if the writer, waving some canonical document or little book, would be able to judge about that. It's part of the typical "us and them" way of thinking, which is usually a source of misery only. Ciao, -- FA Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica Parma, Italia Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
