On Thursday 06 August 2009 09:59:39 Chris Cannam wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:23 PM, drew Roberts<z...@100jamz.com> wrote: > > On Thursday 06 August 2009 03:51:30 you wrote: > >> The second question becomes broadly irrelevant here if we are > >> prepared to accept Bob did convey his intention that the Impro-Visor > >> code be GPL'd, but Arnout and I were responding to the blanket "use of > >> GPL code makes it GPL" (which would imply the second question above). > > > > And this I certainly agree with. Use of GPL code does not automatically > > make another program GPL. It just gives the author of that code a legal > > headache if the new program is not GPL. > > Yes, exactly.
Pure BS. People who cannot read the GPL properly. Raymond _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
