Raymond Martin wrote: > On Thursday 06 August 2009 09:59:39 Chris Cannam wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:23 PM, drew Roberts<z...@100jamz.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thursday 06 August 2009 03:51:30 you wrote: >>> >>>> The second question becomes broadly irrelevant here if we are >>>> prepared to accept Bob did convey his intention that the Impro-Visor >>>> code be GPL'd, but Arnout and I were responding to the blanket "use of >>>> GPL code makes it GPL" (which would imply the second question above). >>>> >>> And this I certainly agree with. Use of GPL code does not automatically >>> make another program GPL. It just gives the author of that code a legal >>> headache if the new program is not GPL. >>> >> Yes, exactly. >> > > Pure BS. People who cannot read the GPL properly. > > Raymond
Seems to depend of the interpretation what "usage" does mean. I will indicate to the issue about LADSPA used by Non-GPL software. Use of GPL code included to another program makes this other program automatically GPL'd. I guess this is one of the subjects that is easy to understand for people that aren't lawyers and even with broken English. I'm off-line now. Bye, Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
