Hello David, On 07/27/2011 01:44 AM, David Robillard wrote:
> For the sake of the record, serd, sord, and lilv are not LV2 extensions > and are not found at http://lv2plug.in. Serd and sord are minimal RDF > syntax/store libraries (respectively), and not LV2 specific (though > deliberately suitable for implementing LV2). Lilv is an LV2 host > library that uses serd and sord. Serd, sord, and Lilv can be found at > http://drobilla.net I understand that you want LV2 to be a standard and only a standard, and thus only show its specification on http://lv2plug.in. You seem to consider that serd, sord and lilv are helper libraries and only one route amongst other possible routes to host LV2 plugins. This is consistent in /principle/, but do you not something feel like such "modularity" can be confusing, when compared to existing major plugin technologies which provide everything as an SDK? Do you not feel like a complete LV2 SDK would be more developer friendly, in /practice/? Regards, -- Olivier _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
