On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:00 PM, David Robillard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Don't get me wrong, I think the site should be reworked to be as > friendly as possible, to make finding appropriate implementations as > easy as possible, and all that, but declaring an "official SDK" or > whatever just strikes me as silly. You're basically asking if I think > modularity is bad. No, I very emphatically do not think that at all. ;)
I /personally/ agree that an "official SDK" is silly... be it LV2 or Android or Qt or MeeGo or whatever. I'm a developer... why would I want to use some mickey-mouse SDK? Give me the headers... and a chroot... and emacs... and a beer! However, these mickey-mouse SDK's /do/ foster adaptation of the technology. There's a whole generation of ADHD Devs who are looking for some kind of gooey instant gratification. "Oooo, an Eclipse plug-in! Shiny!" ...and there's the fact that LV2 really /is/ just-a-little-too-abstract for your average dev. So, while the idea of an LV2 SDK disgusts me (personally)... Olivier is right that it would accelerate developer acceptance. -gabriel _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
