Hello Gabriel, On 07/29/2011 04:32 PM, Gabriel Beddingfield wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Olivier Guilyardi <[email protected]> wrote: >> possible routes to host LV2 plugins. This is consistent in /principle/, but >> do >> you not something feel like such "modularity" can be confusing, when >> compared to >> existing major plugin technologies which provide everything as an SDK? Do you >> not feel like a complete LV2 SDK would be more developer friendly, in >> /practice/? > > Sure, this would be a Good Thing. It just needs someone to > propose/implement it. Olivier? :-)
1. I don't have time to work on this. 2. That's a task for the core LV2 devs IMO and I'm not part of the LV2 team. 3. If I became part of the team, I wouldn't see things from the outside anymore, which is useful to give practical ideas. I have spent some time trying to get a global figure of plugins in general, and this SDK question comes from this point of view. An external point of view. -- Olivier _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
