On 09/04/2011 02:42 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
the issues with the performance of boost::function are reasonably well known and were well documented in the article that florian linked to, along with a much better performing drop-in replacement.
Correction: It wasn't me ;D It was Pedro Alves who posted that link. I was not aware of these performance issues. And in my usecase they are irrelevant, so I'll stick with boost::function. For other designs it might be worth reconsidering though..
Flo _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
