On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Nick Lanham wrote: > Firstly, yes, at some point I would like to have kit editing/creation > available from the GUI. This is non-trivial however, and a bit down the > road. > > To your second point, I agree that it's non-optimal to have to fire up > hydrogen to make minor changes to kits and the like. However, I still think > DrMr improves the situation, as it sits nicely in your host, saves all your > parameters, and doesn't require any external routing. Of course if you're > fine with setting up all the external routing and kit loading etc, you > should just avoid DrMr all together, hydrogen is more fully featured and > almost certainly more stable anyway, but the whole point of me writing DrMr > was that I got sick of having to set up both my host and hydrogen for every > track i wanted to open.
Nooooooo, I actually quite like the idea of being able to JFD drums programming directly in a DAW :) The UI could do with quite a bit of love (it's really OK for an initial release), but DrMr is already a huge win for me. > But yes, kit customization is in the pipeline, although behind getting the > core solid and stable. What are the top priorities for you right now? Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
