On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Sebastian Moors wrote: >> But yes, kit customization is in the pipeline, although behind getting the >> core solid and stable. > > Hm, i'm sceptic about this point... This code duplication seems to be quite > an overhead. If you go into every detail of drumkit management, you end up > with re-writing a lot of hydrogen classes in plain C. Is that really worth > the effort? > > Why not improve the drumkit editing abilities of hydrogen? Or create a > dedicated drumkit editor on top of hydrogen's codebase (imho, hydrogen is > not really user-friendly enough when it comes to kit-creation...) ?
Or make a libhydrogen with a plain C public API? :) Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
