>> yep. as described in the comment for audioengine_port_register(), if >> the port type is not a builtin, then a buffer must be provided as the >> 4th argument. i should also have documented that PortIsMulti is >> illegal for such ports (to ensure 1:1 connections at all times, for >> reasons documented in previous discussions). > >I was going to object to this, but after some thought I don't think it >matters. > >I'm still not clear on where the plugin gets the memory from though, >how does the plugin request a buffer from the host? an excellent point. scratch the requirement mentioned above. it has to provide the size of the buffer in bytes ... :) --p
- [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, par... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Jay Ts
- Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part... Rick Burnett
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Simon Per Soren Kagedal
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, par... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, ... Jay Ts
- Re: Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA propos... Alexander Ehlert
- Re[4]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, ... Rick Burnett
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Abramo Bagnara
