Hi, it's definitly necessary to do LAAGA in C, not in C++. It's easy to wrap C in C++, but not vice versa. Cheers, Alex
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Jay Ts
- Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Rick Burnett
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Simon Per Soren Kagedal
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: Re[2]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ... Jay Ts
- Re[4]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part... Alexander Ehlert
- Re[4]: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part... Rick Burnett
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Owen McCusker
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Tom Pincince
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Simon Per Soren Kagedal
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ?? Simon Per Soren Kagedal
