RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype

[Richard W.E. Furse]

I must admit I don't really follow this - what's the point of "extending
LADSPA to do IPC"? LADSPA is intended as a way to abstract out DSP
algorithms - IPC sounds like an odd thing to bring into this. I could be
missing the point however...

The XML categorisation stuff is an interesting idea however.

--Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard
Guenther
Sent: 14 August 2001 16:48
To: Paul Davis
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype


On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Paul Davis wrote:

[... dictator vs. community snipped]

Yeah :) Thats it. LADSPA is the dictator way, too - so I think
extending LADSPA to do IPC without interfering with its simple
API is more suitable to our user/developer community than doing
the same thing again. Lets have a GLAME/GStreamer like API for
the real men that want to do powerful nodes.

See my previous mail - Richard.

--
Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/
The GLAME Project: http://www.glame.de/