On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Richard W.E. Furse wrote:

> I must admit I don't really follow this - what's the point of "extending
> LADSPA to do IPC"? LADSPA is intended as a way to abstract out DSP
> algorithms - IPC sounds like an odd thing to bring into this. I could be
> missing the point however...

Well its mainly providing a library that is a LADSPA host
(framework) which supports IPC and a explicit network representation.

> The XML categorisation stuff is an interesting idea however.

And its badly needed - at the moment I "hash" LADSPA plugins by their
first character to not have a menu of plugins that does not fit on
the screen...

Richard.

--
Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/
The GLAME Project: http://www.glame.de/

Reply via email to