I wrote:
>(though of course, optimizations of the form
>
> if (!bufferSilent) {
> memset (buffer, 0, nframes * somesize);
> bufferSilent = TRUE;
> }
>
>would work too)
this is a bad morning. that kind of optimization will not work at all,
since the port buffer memory may change from process() to process().
sorry for any confusion. what was i thinking (or not)?
--p
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Paul Davis
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Richard W.E. Furse
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Richard W.E. Furse
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Richard Guenther
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Steve Harris
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Paul Davis
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Paul Davis
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Paul Davis
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype Steve Harris
