On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:37:18PM -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
> 
> I like this idea a little better.  The file would be named ladspa_id.xml
> and would live in presets/ directly.  The only problem would be having to
> handle duplicate names.

You could ban them. Use the "ID" attribute type for the name attribute.
 
> We still wouldn't need to specify the ladspa_id within the file though.
> I'm not against it.  It just seems redundent.

Hmmm... I've had too many accidents with dodgy shell scripts and ended up
with a load of files called 12414.db etc. Being able to put them back in
the right place is important.

- Steve

Reply via email to