On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Steve Harris wrote:

> > We still wouldn't need to specify the ladspa_id within the file though.
> > I'm not against it.  It just seems redundent.
> 
> Hmmm... I've had too many accidents with dodgy shell scripts and ended up
> with a load of files called 12414.db etc. Being able to put them back in
> the right place is important.

Putting the ladspa_id in the filename greatly simplifies the processing.
We can do load on demand.  If you want, I wouldn't mind checking an
internal id to make sure that this is, in fact, the settings for plugin
1123.  But I really don't like scanning all the presets at startup or some
such thing.

Taybin

Reply via email to