On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:27:13AM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
> > I like this idea a little better.  The file would be named ladspa_id.xml
> > and would live in presets/ directly.  The only problem would be having to
> > handle duplicate names.
> 
> Yeah, on further reflection I don't think it would work. I understand
> that it's very helpful to be able to get the ladspa id from *some*
> part of the path, whether it's the basename or the parent directory,
> and that just doesn't mesh well with a variable number of presets in
> each file. I think it should be either one file per plugin or one file
> per preset. I can't think of any significant advantages to the former,
> and the latter would be a lot easier for hosts to handle.

I think Taybin means ladspa_$(ID).xml, so one file per plugin.

- Steve

Reply via email to