> second, as has been said many times here, the "S" in LADSPA stands for
> "Simple". LADSPA was never intended to be a complete plugin API. it

right, but sufficiently simple borders on useless.

> third, calling LADSPA "over-engineered" strikes me as similar to

I wasn't referring to LADSPA, but some of the ancillary discussions.

> we'll be looking for it.

and I'm sure you'll all have many problems with it, just as I do LADSPA :)


Tim

Reply via email to