> useless? steve's set plus ardour as the host (or possibly other apps) > provides me with a very rich working environment. there are very few > issues i have with LADSPA right now that are not shared by VST (for > example). the main ones would be the lack of string parameters and the > inability to use LADSPA plugins easily in a non-streaming/realtime > context. it has provide something for linux audio that wasn't there > before, and it has met just about every goal that was ever set for > it. simple, yes. useless, not even close.
No need to get on the defensive, really. I don't deny the usefulness or importance of LADSPA _AT_ALL_. It is, by and large, a very good system. Yeeeesh - I have some different ideas that I want to play out, that is all. Tim
