On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:38:04PM +0100, Alfons Adriaensen wrote: > > So I think this would be an acceptable solution for LADSPA, and it > > would involve fewer changes to existing hosts than adding refernce > > buffers. > > I agree. It was not clear at all how the plugin should obtain the dummy > pointer value to compare with -- that would probably require more invasive > changes. > > OK, now that we agree :-), I'll leave to you the honour of designating the > new hint bit. If you like I'll add the necessary comments to the header > file and send it for approval this weekend.
Can we wait until the 1.2 pending changes go through - I think there more important and I dont want them to get tangled up in the this. Not all the stakeholders have agreed that disconnected ports are LADSPA-y enough yet either. - Steve
