On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:47:07PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote: > > I would not like a (to my mind) artificial split between modular synth > > plugins and general LADSPA plugins either. > > > > The only thing I'm really missing from the LADSPA specs at the moment is > > the availability of 'recorded' streams (so you could implement a sample > > player as a LADSPA plugin, or play recorded tracks backward, etc.) > > Use a sampler app for this. What's the point of being able to do it in > a LADSPA plugin?
It just bothers me that it's impossible (or at least, unportable) to use user defined waveforms in LADSPA plugins. Especially since I cannot find any other "open" and widely supported plugin format that supports this. Joost.
