Steve Harris wrote: >Can we wait until the 1.2 pending changes go through - I think there >more important and I dont want them to get tangled up in the this.
is there a draft/diff for LADSPA 1.2 i could have a look at? i have no idea what the changes will be (have been off l-a-d for most of 2003) and would like to find out. >Not all the stakeholders have agreed that disconnected ports are >LADSPA-y enough yet either. nothing of an important stakeholder here, but to me hinting 'accept-null-pointer' per port sounds ok, provided we have enough spare hint bits. tim
