On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Tue 21-02-17 18:09:45, Jan Kara wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this is a second revision of the patch set to fix several different races and
>> issues I've found when testing device shutdown and reuse. The first three
>> patches are fixes to problems in my previous series fixing BDI lifetime 
>> issues.
>> Patch 4 fixes issues with reuse of BDI name with scsi devices. With it I 
>> cannot
>> reproduce the BDI name reuse issues using Omar's stress test using scsi_debug
>> so it can be used as a replacement of Dan's patches. Patches 5-11 fix oops 
>> that
>> is triggered by __blkdev_put() calling inode_detach_wb() too early (the 
>> problem
>> reported by Thiago). Patches 12 and 13 fix oops due to a bug in gendisk code
>> where get_gendisk() can return already freed gendisk structure (again 
>> triggered
>> by Omar's stress test).
>>
>> People, please have a look at patches. They are mostly simple however the
>> interactions are rather complex so I may have missed something. Also I'm
>> happy for any additional testing these patches can get - I've stressed them
>> with Omar's script, tested memcg writeback, tested static (not udev managed)
>> device inodes.
>>
>> Jens, I think at least patches 1-3 should go in together with my fixes you
>> already have in your tree (or shortly after them). It is up to you whether
>> you decide to delay my first fixes or pick these up quickly. Patch 4 is
>> (IMHO a cleaner) replacement of Dan's patches so consider whether you want
>> to use it instead of those patches.

FWIW, I wholeheartedly agree with replacing my band-aid with this deeper fix.

Reply via email to