On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:30:48AM +0200, Roel Kluin wrote: > Without this the loop won't start > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[email protected]> > --- > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > index 3ab80e9..2c873c9 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > @@ -2795,7 +2795,7 @@ int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_mapping_tree > *map_tree, > } > } > > - for (i = 0; i > nr; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { > struct btrfs_multi_bio *multi; > struct btrfs_bio_stripe *stripe; > int ret;
Thanks, this does look buggy. That second loop should just be to verify the first loop didn't mess things up. Yan Zheng, is there any reason we shouldn't delete it? -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
