On 07/13/2009 09:26 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > [ sorry, fixed up cc ] > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:22:52AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:30:48AM +0200, Roel Kluin wrote: >>> Without this the loop won't start >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c >>> index 3ab80e9..2c873c9 100644 >>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c >>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c >>> @@ -2795,7 +2795,7 @@ int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_mapping_tree >>> *map_tree, >>> } >>> } >>> >>> - for (i = 0; i > nr; i++) { >>> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { >>> struct btrfs_multi_bio *multi; >>> struct btrfs_bio_stripe *stripe; >>> int ret; >> Thanks, this does look buggy. That second loop should just be to verify >> the first loop didn't mess things up. Yan Zheng, is there any reason we >> shouldn't delete it? >>
It's OK to delete it. Yan Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
