2009/7/13 Chris Mason <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:30:48AM +0200, Roel Kluin wrote: >> Without this the loop won't start >> >> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[email protected]> >> --- >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c >> index 3ab80e9..2c873c9 100644 >> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c >> @@ -2795,7 +2795,7 @@ int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_mapping_tree >> *map_tree, >> } >> } >> >> - for (i = 0; i > nr; i++) { >> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { >> struct btrfs_multi_bio *multi; >> struct btrfs_bio_stripe *stripe; >> int ret; > > Thanks, this does look buggy. That second loop should just be to verify > the first loop didn't mess things up. Yan Zheng, is there any reason we > shouldn't delete it? > It's OK to delete it.
Yan Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
