On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 05:16 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Felix Blanke <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm using btrfs since one year now and it's quite fast. I don't feel any > > differences to other filesystems. Never tried a benchmark but for my daily > > work it's nice. > > Your workload must be light :) >
I recently repeatedly rsync whole partitions (>30GB) without ill effects. (ok - first sync took whole 1s). > > > > The advantage to ext4 for me is the build in raid1 and the snapshots. I'm > > using the snapshot feature for my local backups. I like it because it's > > really easy and uses very few storage. A simple "Snapshot -> Rsync to a > > different disk -> Snapshot" script is the perfect local backup method. > > > > you've never used zfs have you :) > > For that purpose, think "same feature as btrfs snapshot + rsync" but > without needing rsync. This can be very useful as the process of rsync > determining what data to transfer can be quite CPU/disk intensive. Now I'm curious - how do zsf get data off the partition without rsync? Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
