Hi Saul, Well, a little bigger than I expected turned into a lot bigger than I expected. I've pushed the current code to my integration branch, but the next step is to re-integrate it with Dave's current tree and push out rc2.
I need to retest convert as well. -chris Quoting Chris Mason (2013-10-14 11:26:55) > Hi Saul, > > Sorry for the delay, I'll push the patch out this afternoon. > > -chris > > Quoting Saul Wold (2013-10-14 11:25:28) > > On 10/01/2013 06:18 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > > > Hi Saul, > > > > > > The patch ended up a little bigger than I expected because it is sharing > > > infrastructure with btfs-convert. Travel added a little more delay, but > > > I'm almost there. > > > > > > > Any news on this patch? > > > > Sau! > > > > > -chris > > > ________________________________________ > > > From: Saul Wold [s...@linux.intel.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 4:50 PM > > > To: Chris Mason > > > Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org > > > Subject: Re: Issue building a file based rootfs image with mkfs.btrfs > > > > > > On 09/28/2013 05:29 AM, Chris Mason wrote: > > >> Quoting Saul Wold (2013-09-19 14:19:34) > > >>> Hi there, > > >>> > > >>> I am attempting to build a rootfs image from an existing rootfs > > >>> directory tree. I am using the 0.20 @ 194aa4a of Chris's git repo. > > >>> > > >>> The couple problem I saw was that the target image file needed to exist, > > >>> although I think I can patch that then the FS size was much larger than > > >>> the actual size, I tracked this to the usage of ftw not accounting for > > >>> symlinks, I have a patch for that which I will send once I finish > > >>> getting the other issues resolved. > > >>> > > >>> Next issue I hit was an assertion failure after getting "not enough free > > >>> space" message: > > >>> > > >>> not enough free space > > >>> add_file_items failed > > >>> unable to traverse_directory > > >>> Making image is aborted. > > >>> mkfs.btrfs: mkfs.c:1542: main: Assertion `!(ret)' failed. > > >>> > > >>> I am kind of stuck on this one, took it as far as I can right now. > > >>> Would I be better off dropping back to 0.19 or can we move forward > > >>> fixing this? > > >> > > >> Hi Saul, > > >> > > >> Update on my end, the problem is the image code expects every file to > > >> fit inside a single chunk. It's only creating 8MB chunks, so any file > > >> over 8MB in size is causing problems. > > >> > > >> I'm fixing it up here, I should have a patch for you on Monday. > > >> > > > Any update on this? Just curious. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Sau! > > > > > >> Thanks! > > >> > > >> -chris > > >> > > >> -- > > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > > >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
