On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Eryu Guan <eg...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 12:40:13PM +0100, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
>> From: Filipe Manana <fdman...@suse.com>
>>
>> Test that an incremental send works after a file from the parent snapshot
>> gets replaced in the send snapshot by another one at the same exact
>> location, with the same name and with the same inode number.
>>
>> This test used to fail after the linux kernel commit 8b191a684968
>> ("Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed
>> rename") and it's fixed by patch titled:
>>
>>   "Btrfs: send, fix corner case for reference overwrite detection"
>
> I got "btrfs receive" error when testing this, with 4.3-rc1 kernel and
> btrfs-progs v4.2, not sure if this is expected

Yes, it's expected.
The fix isn't yet in any kernel release (nor rc).

thanks

>
> At subvol /mnt/testarea/scratch/mysnap2_ro
> # /usr/bin/btrfs receive /mnt/testarea/scratch -f 
> /mnt/testarea/test/btrfs-test-104/1.snap
> At subvol mysnap1
> # /usr/bin/btrfs receive /mnt/testarea/scratch -f 
> /mnt/testarea/test/btrfs-test-104/2.snap
> ERROR: unlink o258-7-0 failed. No such file or directory
> At snapshot mysnap2_ro
> failed: '/usr/bin/btrfs receive /mnt/testarea/scratch -f 
> /mnt/testarea/test/btrfs-test-104/2.snap'
>
> Thanks,
> Eryu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to