Thanks for the comments. Sorry for the delay. Trying to find out if there is any pending concerns...
Hopefully, per-filesystem hot-spares will be a high priority too, as that type of usage is pretty much required for many enterprise type uses, although that doesn't need to be the same code doing it (in fact, I could see having per-fs spares and global spares both available potentially being very useful).
That's doable with in the current design as well, however stability and hardening (fixing the possible loop holes) is kind of priority. Thanks, Anand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
