On 2015-11-13 05:17, Anand Jain wrote:
FWIW, I'm planning on setting up a VM to test this over the weekend (I would have already, but I've been kind of busy at work this week), so I'll hopefully have some more feedback on Monday.Thanks for the comments. Sorry for the delay. Trying to find out if there is any pending concerns...
Entirely understandable, I would actually be somewhat worried if stability and hardening weren't the priority right now.Hopefully, per-filesystem hot-spares will be a high priority too, as that type of usage is pretty much required for many enterprise type uses, although that doesn't need to be the same code doing it (in fact, I could see having per-fs spares and global spares both available potentially being very useful).That's doable with in the current design as well, however stability and hardening (fixing the possible loop holes) is kind of priority.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
