在 2015年11月13日 18:20, Anand Jain 写道:
Thanks for commenting.
I'm sorry but I didn't quite see the benefit of a spare device.
Aside from what Duncan said (and I happen to agree with him), there is
also the fact that hot-spares are (at least traditionally in most RAID
systems) usually used with RAID5 or RAID6 (or some other parity scheme).
So, to summarize:
1. Hot spares are more useful for most users in global context, and in
that case only if they have more than one filesystem.
2. A pool of hot spares is even more useful.
Agreed, just as Ducan said.
Although only one spare device is supported yet.
You can add more than one spare device currently.
3. Assuming whole disk usage (as opposed to partitioning), the hot spare
will have no load on it until it gets used, at which point it will
almost always be in better physical condition than the device it
replaced (which is important for HA systems, in such cases you replace
the disk that failed, and make the new disk a hot spare)
OK, that's also right, if no one is calling btrfs dev scan with a
interval.
Not too sure what you mean about the scan part.
Btrfs device scan will need to read the sb of the device.
So the hot spare device won't really sleep for a long time as each time
btrfs scan devices, it will wakeup the device.
Not sure about soft raid hot spare. Maybe they won't cause any IO on the
device? Or just the same with btrfs hot spare.
Thanks,
Qu
Thanks, Anand
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
