Am Mittwoch, 30. November 2016, 12:09:23 CET schrieb Chris Murphy: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn > > <ahferro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The stability info could be improved, but _absolutely none_ of the things > > mentioned as issues with raid1 are specific to raid1. And in general, in > > the context of a feature stability matrix, 'OK' generally means that there > > are no significant issues with that specific feature, and since none of > > the > > issues outlined are specific to raid1, it does meet that description of > > 'OK'. > > Maybe the gotchas page needs a one or two liner for each profile's > gotchas compared to what the profile leads the user into believing. > The overriding gotcha with all Btrfs multiple device support is the > lack of monitoring and notification other than kernel messages; and > the raid10 actually being more like raid0+1 I think it certainly a > gotcha, however 'man mkfs.btrfs' contains a grid that very clearly > states raid10 can only safely lose 1 device.
Wow, that manpage is quite an resource. Developers, documentation people definitely improved the official BTRFS documentation. Thanks, -- Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
