On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:01:43PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off
> on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in order
> to resolve various concerns around the mixture of code in btrfs-progs
> with libbtrfsutil.
> Each significant (i.e. non-trivial) commit author has been CC'd to
> request their sign-off on this. Please reply to this to acknowledge
> whether or not this is acceptable for your code.

Thanks! I think we have acks for all non-trivial contirbutions. For the
record, the trivial one are:

* dbf60b488e3b ("libbtrfsutil: update btrfs_util_delete_subvolume docs")
  a comment update, clarifying usage

* 2e67bf0ed69d ("btrfs-progs: docs: fix typos in READMEs, INSTALL and * 
* b1d39a42a4ef ("btrfs-progs: fix typos in comments")
  treewide comment typo fixes

* 01e35d9f53eb ("btrfs-progs: treewide: Fix missing declarations")
  code changes, but adding static or missing includes

* 9fd37f951be6 ("btrfs-progs: complete the implementation RAID1C34 definitions")
  copied definitions from kernel code

I'm not sure about the commit adding pkg-config spec file, it's not code
but it's beyond what I'd consider trivial. I've added Sheng Mao to CC,
please acknowledge the change.

* 4498fe1a2a7c ("libbtrfsutil: add pkg-config spec file")

I'll update the changelog with all the reasons for relicensing that have
been brought up.

Reply via email to