On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:01:43PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > This is a patch requesting all substantial copyright owners to sign off > on changing the license of the libbtrfsutil code to LGPLv2.1+ in order > to resolve various concerns around the mixture of code in btrfs-progs > with libbtrfsutil. > > Each significant (i.e. non-trivial) commit author has been CC'd to > request their sign-off on this. Please reply to this to acknowledge > whether or not this is acceptable for your code.
Thanks! I think we have acks for all non-trivial contirbutions. For the record, the trivial one are: * dbf60b488e3b ("libbtrfsutil: update btrfs_util_delete_subvolume docs") a comment update, clarifying usage * 2e67bf0ed69d ("btrfs-progs: docs: fix typos in READMEs, INSTALL and * CHANGES") * b1d39a42a4ef ("btrfs-progs: fix typos in comments") treewide comment typo fixes * 01e35d9f53eb ("btrfs-progs: treewide: Fix missing declarations") code changes, but adding static or missing includes * 9fd37f951be6 ("btrfs-progs: complete the implementation RAID1C34 definitions") copied definitions from kernel code I'm not sure about the commit adding pkg-config spec file, it's not code but it's beyond what I'd consider trivial. I've added Sheng Mao to CC, please acknowledge the change. * 4498fe1a2a7c ("libbtrfsutil: add pkg-config spec file") I'll update the changelog with all the reasons for relicensing that have been brought up.