> ----------
> From: Glynn Clements[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: Glynn Clements
> Sent: 7. august 1998 02:21
> To: James
> Cc: Linux C Programming List
> Subject: Re: Malloc()
>
(..snip..)
> The program code and read-only data (e.g. string literals) are even
> more `virtual'; they are paged into memory from the executable as
> required, so they never occupy any swap.
>
>
Is this true ?
On my system, it is possible to compile/link a new (changed) version of
a program, while a copy is still running. After the link, the running
old copy no more have a valid executable, thus. How come ?
Niels HP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
