Glynn Clements wrote:

> CyberPeasant wrote:
>
> > > So, it's basically a toss-up between features or simplicity. Judging
> > > by the longevity of Unix, it would seem that simplicity wins.
> >
> > If longevity is the criterium, doesn't MVS or some other hoary IBM
> > mainframe OS win? COBOL, RPG, warts and all...
>
> They would if people still used them for all-new systems.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that the only
> reason that any of the above were still in use was for compatibility
> with existing setups.
>
> Unix (and Linux) is being installed in environments with no prior
> history of Unix usage. Is the same true of IBM mainframes, COBOL, RPG,
> etc?

Here in the Michigan/Illinois area,  IBM AS/400's are selling at an all time
high!  RGP programers are making so much money they need dump trucks to take
it to the bank!  COBOL, you can't find a COBOL programer because they're all
busy fixing Y2K problems.  There is even a shortage of LadderLogic
programers here(I'm willing to bet most of you don't even know what that
is). The GM Truck and Bus facility runs on PL/1. Have you all gotten the
point yet?  So, stop the bashing, from where I'm sitting if you can program
an abacus you can find work. Business are that fussy.

-ted


>
>
> --
> Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
----------------------------------------------------
Ted Maciag, C Programer / UNIX Admin.
* Page me http://wwp.mirabilis.com/10417837
* E-mail Express [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to