Yeah well... UNIX does have stuff that NT doesn't if that's what you're on about.. (Like file extensions .. UNIX doesn't need any! a '.exe' file might be a html one for all we know, and NT ... well... you know. > > For the simple reason that unix doesn't have enough. The root vs > the world and the "user group" stuff is, well, inadequate. > > "Microsoft Windows NT Server is the most {yeah right!} --
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Karl F. Larsen
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Glynn Clements
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Marin D
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Pete Ryland
- Re: [svlug] VMS style ACLs? Hans Reiser
- Re: VMS style ACLs? YES! in "EXT3" in 2.3 and 2... R. Brock Lynn
- crypt() Command Joseph Durbin
- Re: crypt() Command ZioBudda
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Glen Fernandes
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Harold Sinclair
- Re: VMS style ACLs? CyberPeasant
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Eugene Leitl
- Re: VMS style ACLs? doc
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Glynn Clements
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Karl F. Larsen
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Glynn Clements
- Re: VMS style ACLs? CyberPeasant
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Karl F. Larsen
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Ted Maciag