CyberPeasant writes: > I think that the desired place to implement security is in the > kernel and/or fs. Yes. And video, and speech input, and mouse drivers, and stuff. This would seem to run against the trend towards micro and nanokernels. If we ever are to progress to systems-on-a-wafer, we _need_ nanokernels. ciao, 'gene > Under RMS, things like the meaning and definition of the fields > of a database record (including ACLs at the field level), can > be specified at the time the database is created. > > Once again, I haven't had my hands on a VMS system since 1989, > so I'm working from memory. > > Dave > -- > --== Things that suck: mowing the lawn ==--
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Marin D
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Pete Ryland
- Re: [svlug] VMS style ACLs? Hans Reiser
- Re: VMS style ACLs? YES! in "EXT3" in 2.3 and 2... R. Brock Lynn
- crypt() Command Joseph Durbin
- Re: crypt() Command ZioBudda
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Glen Fernandes
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Harold Sinclair
- Re: VMS style ACLs? CyberPeasant
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Eugene Leitl
- Re: VMS style ACLs? doc
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Glynn Clements
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Karl F. Larsen
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Glynn Clements
- Re: VMS style ACLs? CyberPeasant
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Karl F. Larsen
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Ted Maciag
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Glynn Clements
- Re: VMS style ACLs? CyberPeasant
- Re: VMS style ACLs? Andrea Arcangeli